Macaw: The Machine Learning Magnetometer Calibration Workflow

In Earth Systems Science, many complex data pipelines combine different data sources and apply data filtering and analysis steps. Typically, such data analysis processes are historically grown and implemented with many sequentially executed scripts. Scientific workflow management systems (SWMS) allow scientists to use their existing scripts and provide support for parallelization, reusability, monitoring, or failure handling. However, many scientists still rely on their sequentially called scripts and do not profit from the out-of-the-box advantages a SWMS can provide. In this work, we transform the data analysis processes of a Machine Learning-based approach to calibrate the platform magnetometers of non-dedicated satellites utilizing neural networks into a workflow called Macaw (MAgnetometer CAlibration Workflow). We provide details on the workflow and the steps needed to port these scripts to a scientific workflow. Our experimental evaluation compares the original sequential script executions on the original HPC cluster with our workflow implementation on a commodity cluster. Our results show that through porting, our implementation decreased the allocated CPU hours by 50.2% and the memory hours by 59.5%, leading to significantly less resource wastage. Further, through parallelizing single tasks, we reduced the runtime by 17.5%.Comment: Paper accepted in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW

Towards Advanced Monitoring for Scientific Workflows

Scientific workflows consist of thousands of highly parallelized tasks executed in a distributed environment involving many components. Automatic tracing and investigation of the components' and tasks' performance metrics, traces, and behavior are necessary to support the end user with a level of abstraction since the large amount of data cannot be analyzed manually. The execution and monitoring of scientific workflows involves many components, the cluster infrastructure, its resource manager, the workflow, and the workflow tasks. All components in such an execution environment access different monitoring metrics and provide metrics on different abstraction levels. The combination and analysis of observed metrics from different components and their interdependencies are still widely unregarded. We specify four different monitoring layers that can serve as an architectural blueprint for the monitoring responsibilities and the interactions of components in the scientific workflow execution context. We describe the different monitoring metrics subject to the four layers and how the layers interact. Finally, we examine five state-of-the-art scientific workflow management systems (SWMS) in order to assess which steps are needed to enable our four-layer-based approach.Comment: Paper accepted in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data Workshop SCDM 202